Should Social Security Medical Exams be done by Doctors who are Specialists?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
This is where more people would probably have a problem with the system, when claimants are sent to consultative exams performed by private physicians who practice in a medical area that is unrelated to the claimant's impairment(s). But the truth is, most physical consultative examinations would, realistically, only require the doctor to have an M.D.

In an ideal world, would it be optimal to send every claimant who lists angina or tachycardia to a cardiologist? Or every claimant who lists fibromyalgia to a pain specialist? Perhaps. But you probably wouldn't get a much better return in terms of the type of information that these exams record. A CE, or consultative exam, is basically a physical and the information that is obtained is fairly general.

Any competent doctor should be able to do one, regardless of their area of specialty, right? Also, the examining physician is not tasked with trying to sleuth anything out. He or she is simply providing a recent snapshot of a claimant's condition. Which goes to the heart of why consultative exams are scheduled in the first place. Usually, it is simply because the claimant's medical records do not contain recent documentation (meaning within the last 90 days). Recent documentation is required for social security to determine that the claimant is currently disabled and, thus, award, benefits.

Even if the social security administration came to the conclusion that it would be better to send all claimants to doctors practicing in specialized areas for consultative exams, how would this be afforded? There's no doubt that you'd have to pay more to get specialists to perform such exams. As it is now, DDS agencies are constantly recruiting new physicians to perform consultative exams because other physicians are continually dropping out of the program. Why? Low rates of reimbursement for performing exams AND the fact that social security claimants often fail to go to their scheduled appointments. If you think about it, you're only going to get doctors who aren't too busy, or who need the revenue. That's not going to include specialists.

On the subject of funding, the DDS agencies across the country seem to rely on federal funding, even down to the salaries of examiners, who are state employees. It doesn't seem conceivable that the federal SSA budget, which depends on Congressional approval, would expand to facilitate this--after all, right now the forced position of SSA is that they will only replace one out of every three social security field office workers that are lost to attrition or retirement.







Additional Information on:
Social Security Disability







Social Security Disability Questions



Join the Facebook page: Social Security Disability on Facebook




















No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.ssdrc.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/disabh4b/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/42

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by SSDRC published on August 29, 2012 10:35 AM.

Do you have to be almost dead before you can receive disability? was the previous entry in this blog.

Can a Mentally Disabled Person receive SSDI if they are a beneficiary to a trust fund? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.